![]() I don't have the D750 but have shot with it and found the transition smooth. They are a very good pair of 24MP cameras. The control layout is pretty much aligned with the D750 so that's also going to help you. If you need the reach its a very good solution. Its a great package and only bettered by the D500 but that body is a fair bit more expensive! The D7200 remains in my bag and I use it a good deal. I'd always prefer to crop without the TC if I can. The III is marginally better but I still consider it an absolutely last resort on this zoom. I've used the TC 1.4e in II and III versions with this lens. The VR really helps coupled with a bit of good technique.) (BTW, I've had critically sharp images at 1/100s not every shot of course but enough to have real keepers in difficult situations. If you can shoot that lens on a D750, I really doubt you will have an issue. DX cameras with smaller sensors are optimized. Different NIKKOR lenses are designed to accommodate the different camera sensor sizes. The DX-format is the smaller sensor at 24x16mm the larger full frame FX-format sensor measures 36x24mm which is approximately the same size as 35mm film. I have no real issues with that pixel density but I may be biased as that's what I use. Nikon makes a DX-format sensor and an FX-format sensor. If you can't get the reach on the 500 end on your D750, I suspect you are in the same place. I'd love to say I can get all the reach from a 300mm on DX for wildlife but simply not the case for me. I shot the 200-500 from its launch on a D7200 and latterly on D500. Good luck with your decisions and I hope this helps in some way. Ideally, I would like to have a D7200 and a D750. For 2 primary reasons:ġ - Consider a D7200 as a 1.5x TC with no loss of light.Ģ - It will also give you a backup camera in case you need to send in the D750 for service.Īnother reason would be for when you wanted to lighten your load for certain outings.Īll in all, adding a D7200 would increase your flexibility and options for wildlife shooting at a very reasonable investment.įwiw. I would definitely consider getting a refurb D7200 to go along with what you have. So I know at least one person has had good success with that camera. Just within the last few days, a D7200 photographer on this forum posted some absolutely stunning BIF pictures of a kestrel. Do you D7200 users have any other thoughts or advice. Setting aside user error, will the D7200 and 200-500mm combination produce better results that a teleconverter on the D750? I haven't read anything positive about using a teleconverter with that lens.Ĥ. Will the D7200's higher pixel density require noticeably faster shutter speeds to get sharp captures?ģ. Do you think the extra reach from a crop frame will be worth the investment?Ģ. Specifically, for those of you who do a lot of bird photography (especially song bird sized subjects) -ġ. I would appreciate any advice and thoughts about adding that crop frame to my gear list. But I am considering a crop frame camera (Nikon D7200), just for the extra reach with the 200-500mm lens. So, I doubt I'll ever own a prime 500mm lens. I don't want to spend a lot more on gear. I have a full frame Nikon (D750) and a Nikkor 200-500mm. I'm going to be doing more bird and wildlife photography in the coming years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |